jump to navigation

Shadowfax becomes a number August 31, 2008

Posted by philangelus in family, sarcasm.
3 comments

Jumping onto the “guest poster” bandwagon, we have my Patient Husband. 

For the last two years, I’ve had a personalized plate that reads “SHADOWFAX”. Okay, not quite, but it was a fairly recognizable seven-letter compression of the name. I liked it because Shadowfax is the horse Gandalf rides in The Lord of the Rings. THe name means “grey-coat,” and the car is a silver-grey color. Also the car is a hybrid, and Shadowfax had endurance far beyond ordinary horses.

It’s not the best Tolkien-themed license plate I’ve ever seen, but it made me smile to think that most people behind me were rolling their eyes and thinking “What a geek.”

[In case you're curious, the best Tolkien-themed plate I've ever seen was one that said NOROLIM. I only saw it for an instant, because the car it was on was weaving through traffic at high speed on a six-lane divided highway. At first I didn't even recognize what it was, but then I remembered that "Noro lim" is how Glorfindel tells his horse at the Ford to flee from the Black Riders -- "Ride on, ride on!" What a great use of the seven-letter limit. I imagine most people have no idea what it means.]

In the new state where Angelborough is, plates are six letters long. There are really only a few reasonable compressions of Shadowfax to six letters, and they’re taken. Combined with the bureaucratic overhead of the DMV, the end result is that the car formerly known as Shadowfax, the magic horse, is now a meaningless six-character combination of letters and numbers.

It makes me a little sad when I see it. The car is still the same car; it still handles well and gets great mileage, and I still have the plate in the wall on the garage. There are plenty of identifying pieces of flair on the car that make it easily recognizable. But it feels like the new state took away a little piece of my individuality.

On the bright side, it’s much less likely that my brother will yell “Run, Shadowfax! Show us the meaning of speed!” next time he gets into the car.

Weblog tour: chance occurrences August 30, 2008

Posted by philangelus in weblog tour, writing.
1 comment so far

Aug 23rd Blog Topic

Looking back, what minor event in you life made a major outcome on how things turned out?  

I’ll give you two, one good and one bad.

The bad: At summer camp just after we moved to Brooklyn, I was put into the wrong group on the first day. I should have been with the first graders and I was put with the kindergarteners. And that chance mixup ended up getting me targeted for bullying and harassment by the other kids in my school that didn’t end until I changed not only schools but school districts in 9th grade.

The good: by chance, I ended up seeing a promo for a cartoon called “Battle of the Planets.” I’d never seen it before in its first run. I knew nothing about it. But I watched it, and at some point or another, my imagination ran away with it.

I have always been a story-teller at heart, but this was the first time that fictional characters came along and devoured my psyche, to the point where I longed for them to be real, living people. I hoped there would be new episodes of BotP in Heaven, or maybe God would animate my little stories that I told myself about them and let me watch their world as if it were a show itself.

It went off the air, and I learned about loss, but I learned I could keep the stories in my heart. I learned to develop characters. In the end, I think it’s safe to say that seeing Battle of the Planets made me a writer.


http://meganeileen2005.typepad.com/  twinkletoes
http://thatsloanegirl.blogspot.com/   CathyF
http://wryexchange.com/   Wry Exchange
http://www.absentmindedhousewife.com/  beckygoesape
http://verycontrary.wordpress.com/  Contrary
http://amandagorby.blogspot.com/  amanda_tg                 
http://whatsmylife.blogspot.com/ grinningcomb
http://nolechica.livejournal.com  nolechica
http://addierambles.blogspot.com  andra
http://la-eme.livejournal.com   MsMoonbunny
http://mischief0617.wordpress.com/  CrowGirl
http://www.housewife2000.blogspot.com   housewife2k
http://fatgirlartist.blogspot.com/  Amy Rose
http://lulupop.wordpress.com  Lulupop
http://chrisnada.livejournal.com/  Cnada
http://robandkrista.blogspot.com/  CelticGemini
http://anime-coroner.livejournal.com/. AllyKat
http://www.drunkenhousewife.com/ The Drunken Housewife
http://ladyj3000.blogspot.com/   LadyJ3000
http://heartstart.livejournal.com  Heartstar1
http://hijinksshenanigans.blogspot.com/  Hijinks’s Shenanigans
http://deltatangosgbs.blogspot.com/  afbluebelle
http://sarahesperanza.wordpress.com/ SquishyMooMoo
http://www.dutifuldanielle.blogspot.com/ dpbenson
http://sinkingtent.blogspot.com/ ladiedeathe
http://divine-misse.livejournal.com Shotochick (only readable by those that have a livejournal account)
http://mrsbart.blogspot.com/ MrsBart
http://rainhaville.blogspot.com  RainhaDoTexugo
http://kimberlysstories.wordpress.com  Kherbert05 
http://sisterlilbunnythecorpseflinger.wordpress.com/  Lil Bunny

Sonship versus transactionalism August 29, 2008

Posted by philangelus in religion.
7 comments

Husband: Sweetie, are you okay?
Wife: Yes, sir. I’m fine.
Husband: You look tired. Come sit with me for a bit.
Wife: Yes, sir. {sits rigidly on the couch beside her spouse.}
Husband puts his arm around her and she continue to sit rigidly.
Husband: You’re very tense.
Wife: I’m fine, sir.
Husband: Are you angry at me?
Wife: No, sir. I love you dearly.
Husband kisses her, and she turns to him. “Would you like me to perform my wifely duty now, sir?”

Would you say the above is a solid marriage? What about a similar relationship between God and a human soul?

If you recall, on Wednesday we talked about the younger son from the prodigal son parable, and whether he accepted his father’s forgiveness. On Thursday, we talked about forgiving yourself.

When I whirl those two ideas together in my cuisinart brain, I end up with two models of service to God. The first is the sonship model, the one we hear about most often. It looks like this:

Person: Father, I love you, and I need some help.
God: Tell me all about it. I love you too and I want what’s best for you.
Person: {proceeds to lay out the details of his concerns.}

Then there’s this model:

Person: Father, I love you, and I need some help. My son is having problems at school, so what I’m going to do is speak to the teacher, spend dedicated time with him doing his homework, and get him a new organizer. And what I want you to do is {blah blah blah}.
God: Hello?

This model I’ve taken to calling “transactionalism,” and I’d gotten trapped in it. What I’d done was emulate a business model.

In business, relations are supposed to be transactional. A good administrative assistant would say, “Pat, the copier stopped working. I looked for paper jams, changed the toner, restarted it, and checked all the connections. It won’t work on manual or automatic feed. I’d like permission to call the copier repairguy.”

God, I’ve discovered, doesn’t like that so much. He wants you to come into His office and say, “It says paper jam when there is no paper jam.” And then wait.

It feels irresponsible of me not to come to God with the solution in hand to the problem. But of course, God knows how to solve our problems. He wants us to be sons and daughters, not direct reports.

I think sometimes that’s why we get answers to prayers that then don’t work out. Because God wants us to see that we had a good idea, but we shouldn’t dictate what He does.

I also had quite a bit of the model at the top: I show up and do what God wants and sit rigid, trying to anticipate whatever He wants next, and keeping it in terms of what I should do for Him. Again, not good. It not only keeps God at arm’s length, but it’s the full realization of the “hired hand” mentality. It’s the assumption that God doesn’t want us to get close to Him. Or that God can’t stand getting close to us.

Even more, it’s the assumption that I can repay God for what He’s given me, or at the very least stay out of debt. That’s a kind of autonomy that’s impossible to maintain, and it’s an impediment. I’m trying to deserve what I have.

I’ve recently changed my model of requesting-prayer (and it’s tough to keep with it) to just telling God what the problem is. And waiting. Because sometimes I’ve felt pushed a bit to keep talking about why I think something is a problem, or what I’m afraid of. And when I’ve outlined it (in list form) I’ve felt God answering in some instances that what I thought was a problem wasn’t as big as I thought.

(Mental prayer, for some reason, is all waiting and listening. I can do that fine. But I can’t ask for help without the impulse to tell God what He needs to do.)

It’s hard to let go of the transaction-based mentality: I give you this and you give me that. Or even, I’m going to just sit here, small and terrified, and wait for the rejection. Instead God likes it as “You spend time with me, and I spend time with you.” For me, this is a paradigm shift, and it’s tough to stick with it.

Self-forgiveness August 28, 2008

Posted by philangelus in pensive, religion.
9 comments

I always thought of forgiving yourself as psychobabble bunk, but in light of what I wrote yesterday about the prodigal son, it makes sense. (If it is, in fact, psychobabble bunk, that’s what the comment box is for: please tell me.)

When I ask God to forgive me, there’s an implied promise that I’ll accept God’s forgiveness. Asking forgiveness pre-assumes that I believe myself to be forgiveable.

One of the big impediments to forgiving others (according to Mariah Burton Nelson’s book The Unburdened Heart: 5 Keys to Forgiveness and Freedom) is the thought, “But won’t that let him off the hook?”  And no, it doesn’t necessarily. Damage was still done, and there may still be consequences. The forgiven person still ought to make it right or make a gesture toward making it right. But the forgiver lets go of the anger.

Burton Nelson points out that forgiveness and reconciliation are separate actions. I can forgive the man who robbed my house; I’m not going to become friendly with him. You may well reconcile with the person you’ve forgiven, but that’s a decision of its own. Forgiveness consists only in letting go of the anger and reaching a state of acceptance about the deeds of the forgiven person, no longer holding the injury to heart.

In forgiving yourself, I bet the biggest impediment is the same as in forgiving another. “If I forgive myself, then I’m tolerating my own bad behavior. I’m letting myself off the hook.” And worse, “If I forgive myself, I might let down my guard and do it again.”

It’s the equivalent of deciding not to reconcile with oneself, isn’t it?

And if God forgives someone, but the person refuses to forgive himself, it’s an impediment to a relationship with God. It’s a perpetual holding-back. It’s an attempt to take control and keep it. And maybe, when you think about it, that’s the last vestige of pride because I think all people of integrity want to pay back their debts. Only sometimes, when we mess up, we simply can’t. In those cases, accepting forgiveness is all we can do.

Prayer request: illness August 27, 2008

Posted by philangelus in religion.
5 comments

A young mom needs prayers, if you don’t mind. She’s the wife of my Patient Husband’s gamer friend (they play SFB together when they get a chance.) She’s been battling some form of cancer for a while now, and recently took a turn for the worse.

Please pray for her. She has two children close in age to my oldest two, and this has to be devastating for the family. She sounds upbeat and it does sound as if she’s doing better now, but I’m scared for her when I think about it.

May the healing of the Holy Spirit fill her body and soul, and may God grant the family comfort and peace as they continue to struggle against her illness.

One of the hired hands August 27, 2008

Posted by philangelus in religion.
3 comments

Parable: the prodigal son. Today we take on the younger son.

We always hear about the older son because the parable ends with him not yet responding to his father. Jesus frames the parable in such a way that we the listeners seem to be invited to identify with the older: does he accept that his father has forgiven his younger brother?

Allow me to turn the tables: what about the younger brother? Does he accept his father’s forgiveness of him? Does he accept sonship again, or does he continue to treat himself as one of his father’s hired hands? Does he keep his distance? Or does he humble himself enough to give up the last vestiges of control by saying, “Yes, I screwed up, but I’ll accept that you love me damaged”?

Does he allow his father to treat him like a son again? Honestly, we don’t know. That’s not clear in the parable. Both sons’ responses are missing.

Because there’s that sense of pride that can make us think we’re unforgivable and so we never forgive ourselves. To continue to l,ive as one of the father’s servants would allow the younger son to feel he deserves what he has — a home and food — whereas accepting the role of being a returned son means accepting that he doesn’t deserve waht he has. Accepting that to his father, who he is is more important than what he does. That he could never earn the love he receives.

That’s a hard thing because it keeps him in a perpetual debt of a different kind. At that point, his only value is the value his father places on him, even though arguably he’ll work for his father (since his older brother was working in the fields.)

It’s not easy for either son, is my point. We know the father told him not to live as a servant; we don’t know if the son accepted this and returned to live like a son.

Two follow-up posts on the Prodigal Son:

Self-forgiveness & the prodigal
Son versus the hired hand

Mr. Hooper’s Viking Funeral August 26, 2008

Posted by philangelus in angels, sarcasm.
7 comments

Today we have a special FIRST on the weblog. It’s our first guest post, and I’m thrilled. 

Christine (aka Oxymoroness of Etiquettehell) posted this story there, and it’s too good not to request permission to pick it up and carry it over for the readers here. If you  have kids, if you ever were a kid, or if you’ve ever done anything that made your guardian angel wish angels could get mind-blowingly drunk, then this is the story for you.

It’s with great excitement I present to you, courtesy of Christine/Oxymoroness: Mr. Hooper’s Viking Funeral.

(more…)

Paging an associate with an axe to kitchenwares… August 25, 2008

Posted by philangelus in sarcasm.
5 comments

Dear Patient Husband:

If you’re reading this, do NOT be surprised if you come home to find the dishwasher sitting at the edge of the driveway with its suitcase packed, half a bottle of dishwashing detergent sitting on top of it, and a sign saying “California Or Bust.” I’ve HAD IT with that thing.

Love,
your beautiful wife

Loose ends August 25, 2008

Posted by philangelus in pensive, religion, writing.
5 comments

I believe God likes tying up loose ends. God’s an author, after all (The Author) and authors don’t like leaving loose ends in their work except to get the reader to keep reading. God’s writing a pretty big series, so ends can hang loose for a long time. But they tend to tie off eventually.

In my own life, I made an Enemy in my first year of college. I wasn’t sure why or how it all happened, to be honest, except that it was part of the drama and angst of a late-teen’s life. I’m hardly blameless in all this, but I didn’t deserve the treatment I got from that group either. The next year, I distanced myself from all of them.

A week before college ended, I was walking home in the rain and looked up to find my Enemy walking home also, and I offered to share my umbrella.

By the end of the walk, there were no more hard feelings. We’d both matured, and misunderstandings got clarified, and it was okay. I’ll never be his best friend (in fact, I hadn’t thought about him until I wrote this) but there’s no animosity.

I expected the same thing to happen before I left Angeltown. I fully expected that a woman who used to be a friend and later wrote me off as a hopeless case would cross paths with me. That we’d meet or somehow hear of one another, and there would be forgiveness exchanged. Or something.

We used to be good friends. But over time I found it difficult to deal with her continuous competitiveness: she needed to believe she had the better car, the better husband, the better children; they went to the better music class; her church was better than mine; her reading was better than mine; she watched better shows than I did; and so on and so on and so on.

I didn’t care. I still don’t care. Although I laughed a lot in private. 

We drifted apart. She stopped attending the group where we’d initially met. Then about a year ago she mailed back to me all the books she’d borrowed as well as all the books I’d ever given her. That, to me, was as kind a “bugger off” as I’ve ever heard. Washing her hands of me in the gentlest way possible, although I’m not sure why she wanted me to know. I didn’t reply. 

I was sure God would arrange a paths-crossing before I left Angeltown, and it didn’t happen.

I hate having a big cypher in my head. It’s a question mark without a sentence. 

A year from now, she might include me on her Christmas Card list (just so I can see her life is still my superior) and it will get returned to sender. She’ll never find me again unless she cares enough to google me, and maybe she’ll feel hurt that I didn’t tell her I was moving.

Loose ends. As a writer, I despise them. As a character, I dislike them even more. But then again, as an author, I wouldn’t tie them off until they’re ready to be tied, and possibly neither of us is ready yet. So we trust the author and we carry a loose thread into the sequel.

What you look for August 23, 2008

Posted by philangelus in pensive, writing.
2 comments

The first sign of pregnancy with Kiddo#2 was that I cried during the opening credits of My Neighbor Totoro. You know, that sad opening song?

Hey let’s go, hey let’s go!
I’m happy as can be!
Let’s go walking, you and me!
Ready, set, come on, let’s go!

When not pregnant, I’m not a crier-for-stories. I’m not often a crier at all, to tell the truth. Not for books. For movies, only two (one of which is Dumbo, when Mama Jumbo sings “Baby Mine” through the bars of the cage.) 

I’ve got no similar reservations about laughing out loud to something funny. A good comedy will have me laughing until I’m crying, unable to breathe. We should have one of those every few months to clear out the mental toxins.

On Wednesday, we drove back to Angeltown, so I picked up an audiobook from the library. They had “The Best Christmas Pageant Ever” and I knew Kiddo#1 had found it very funny last year; they read it at school, and he’d recounted most of it to me. As it played, I realized much of what he’d recounted to me was verbatim from the book. The child has a scary memory.

I also realized it’s not a good idea to listen to something quite that funny while driving, in case you drive off the road.

The other part of my brain, the part I can’t ever shut up, is the analytical writer part. While I was enjoying it, I kept analyzing how the writer managed to convey the sheer childhood of the narrator without ever talking down about her. The things the child noticed were things children notice. She had a sharp sense of observation but at the same time a keen wonder. 

Since I want to write comedy too, I took note of how she made things so funny that I had to struggle not to drive under a truck.

On the way home, though, I realized something: the book wasn’t just about wacky hijinks. The book was about what you notice. How the narrator noticed things; how the narrator tried not to be noticed; how the Herdmans wanted to be noticed; and then, how you interpret the things you do notice. How we don’t see the things we’ve become overly familiar with.

It was dawning on me as the narrator discussed the actual unfolding of the pageant in the final chapter, how the character of Alice was critical and not noticing the goodness that was happening in front of her because she wanted so badly to take note only of the bad. And that’s when it happened.

Imogen Herdman started to cry. And so did I.

I was driving, so I fought it back. But it happened so fast and so unexpectedly, because here was a book that had made me laugh out loud several times and smile through the rest of it, and here I was in tears. And I couldn’t figure out why.

I still can’t quite figure out why, except that maybe it has to do with someone finally recognizing goodness. Finally finding goodness, and finding it in herself. Finding that even something broken and discarded can be chosen for blessedness.